Hottest topics

Monday, August 19, 2019

"Godzilla: King of Monsters" and radical environmentalism

from movie

Godzilla: King of the Monsters(2019)

In this movie about a giant lizard. The main plot is centered around a growing violent movement based on communism called radical environmentalism. Radical environmentalism is not someone who recycles or who argues for solar panels.  Radical environmentalism is someone who advocates and acts to promote the planet above the lives of humans.  The El Paso Walmart shooter, Dayton shooter and the Garlic Festival shooter all held these radical environmental views.  

The monsters in the movie are representations of natural disasters.  The movie refers to the bad guy as an "eco-terrorist". The female scientist, who we later find out is in on it, says she wants to use the "monsters" to wipe out humanity and reset the earth. She claims the monsters were awakened by humans activity harming the environment. The monsters were the fail safe to protect the earth.
They didn't focus on each monsters representation, but Rodan(flaming pterodactyl) seemed to be volcanoes. Zero(3 headed dragon) was associated with weather or large storms. At one point they said the monsters are causing every type of natural disaster known man and some unknown.
The movie further reinforces the idea that man is a plague on the earth. The same idea pushed out by the likes of AOC(a member of the DSA), Robert "Beto" Orourke and Bill Gates to name a few. They all preach the world ending in 10-12 years or the need to reduce the human population
In the end Godzilla goes Dragon Ball Z or something. I'm not sure what Godzilla represents other than radiation. But the bad guys kept saying "Long live the king" then after Godzilla wins all the monsters bow down to him. Which doesn't make sense because he is GODzilla and they reference the ancients worshiping the monsters as gods. But at the end they hint at a face off between Godzilla and King Kong. Long live the king would have made more sense with Kong. Were there no quotes about gods available? Guess they just needed trailer moments.


I found the young Ben Affleck to be annoying.  But there was an interesting part where she had a choice to go with daddy or stay with eco-terrorist mommy.  She stayed with mommy, but it was almost like there was low key mind control going on.  Then the young Ben Affleck runs off with the most important device in the world at the time and saves humanity. I almost got motion sick from my eyes rolling so hard. 

Side note - The crazy white haired scientist keeps bringing up "hollow earth" theory. Hollow earth theory was a theory the Third Reich tried to prove and generally associated with the paranormal. 


If you have any questions feel free to head over to the Facebook page and ask under the link post.  :)

#XcerptShow

As always leave comment via G+ on the website or like the Facebook page and comment on the post with the site link in it.  What do YOU think?

Links:

Subscribe to our Channel:www.youtube.com/user/xcerptshow

Like us on Facebook: facebook.com/xcerptshow


Follow us on Twitter: @xcerptshow

Saturday, August 17, 2019

What were the views of the Dayton shooter?


The Dayton shooter shot 27 people(9 died) is less than 1 minute.  He had an illegally modified AR-15 with a legal 100 round drum magazine.  His gun was NOT full auto(you need an additional background check to obtain). It was semi auto just like most rifles AND handguns. 1 trigger pull equals 1 bullet fired.  The Dayton shooting over shadowed the controversial police involved shooting of Devon Bailey.


The main reason Betts did not kill more people was, because cops were making the rounds near closing times at the bar and intercepted him before he made it into the bar. Betts was chasing people into the bar as three cops shot him.  Betts had 52 bullet holes in him when he died.  It did not appear he saw the cops and was focused on the people fleeing into the bar while in pursuit.
Contrast the 30 seconds of shooting with the 6min of response time in the El Paso shooting timeline and you see how critical a quick response is.
An even more critical factor is to FIGHT BACK. Fight back against the shooters, and stop them. They are untrained amateurs who have done little if any objective research, and can be overtaken easily.  An attempted mosque shooting in Norway shortly after Dayton and El Paso was stopped by a 65 year old man. I have been preaching this since viewing the Autralia shooting video.  The Australia video should be an ad promoting concealed carry.  He was a complete amateur, but because everyone ran away, and no one challenged him; he killed over 40 people.  Tarrant dropped all of his mags in the mosque hallway, and had to return to pick up a magazine to reload each time.

BACKGROUND


Betts talked openly about killing other people.  Betts was accused of having a kill list in high school and a rape list. He liked to show mass shooting videos on first dates.  Even after this the girl has fond memories of him. She is admittedly mentally ill. Instead of distancing herself from him, she claims he was her boyfriend in and obvious attention whore move.  The girl in question was even helped him attempt to deliver a threatening letter to an ex-girlfriend. She claimed he was her boyfriend but,
"I knew then[after trying to deliver a threat to his ex] that I had to break things off with him, but I waited a few days to cool off. I wanted to wait until my fiance got back from a work trip".
Betts father was a shrink.  Betts was being treated for anxiety, and he may have had issues with being bipolar and OCD as well.

POLITICAL VIEWS


Betts was a Satanist. Betts was in a wired band and sang about weird things.  While his band mates knew the lyrics were just there to be artistically edgy, he took them to heart. He was a truly messed up individual.  He had many warning signs from threatening people is high school with his "kill list" to stalking his ex with another girl who claimed to be his girlfriend while she was engaged to another man.  Had his father recognized the signs he could have done something.  His father lets not forget was a shrink, and it was his professional job to recognize these symptoms.  How he can maintain a license after this seeing all his sons public outcries for attention, is baffling to me.
Betts was also a Antifa member.  This marks, at least, the second terrorist attack by Antifa members...besides all of the protest/counter protest mob assaults.  Betts was a Warren and Sanders supporter not unlike Hodgkinson(GOP baseball shooter). He was also a regular consumer of "Some More News".  SMN pushes the standard leftist antiTrump, "Nazi" and Abolish ICE narrative with a disheveled host that looks like Charlie from "Its Always Sunny in Philadelphia".  Betts was also a self titled leftist but as mentioned above had a "rape list" while hating "racists", but randomly killed 9 people at a bar. These opposing views are yet another sign of his mental instability and how these fringe groups use the mentally unstable to carry out their goals.

If the above picture looks familiar then you recognize it from the Garlic Fest Shooter piece.  THe picture was retweeted by Betts.  The El Paso Walmart shooter, the Garlic Festival shooter and this Dayton shooter all had communist/ radical environmentalist views that echoed the Australian shooter and his manifesto.  Radical environmentalism is a HUGE threat.  Antifa has similar views that magnify these types of events. Their motto is something along the lines of "whatever means necessary".  Killing innocent humans is okay because the environment is being killed by humans.

MISCONCEPTIONS




Was it an "assault rifle"?  NO
The gun Betts used was NOT an "assault rifle". What? But i think it looks...in the words of the Rock, "It doesnt matter what you think it looks like!" If anything the weapon would be a carbine. Carbines existed back in the 1700's.  A carbine is essentially a rifle with a shorter barrel designed for shorter ranged engagements.

Was the gun bought legally?  NO
Authorities were quick to say the rifle was acquired legally, but someone is now facing up to 15 years for helping him buy it.  Anyone with basic AR knowledge looking at the gun can tell you that is not a normal AR. It has a short barrel(requires an additional background check) and for some reason a "shockwave blade" instead of an actual stock. With the modifications the gun would be registered as a rifle, but would be built as a AR pistol.  Do you think he subverted the law maliciously?  The gun was not acquired legally for three reasons.
1) The gun was illegally modified with a shorter barrel. Reports are out now that a friend who Betts frequently did drugs with bought the short barrel upper and body armor for Betts, but was unaware of his intentions to use them.  Modifying a rifle to have a shorter barrel than 16 inches is a federal crime. The gun used was an AR lower most likely registered as a rifle, but the upper was a short barrel upper designed for a SBR that requires a special tax stamp and a more in depth background check to get or an AR pistol.
2) Betts had his friend buy him the short barrel for his rifle allegedly to hide it from his parents.  Buying a gun for someone else is illegal.
3) Betts lied on the gun application.  If you could argue away the top two issues this one is irrefutable. Betts was involved with heavy drug use. Betts friend said they would do "hard drugs together. I thought acid was a hard drug.  Betts friend was a micro doser of mushrooms(just like most of silicon valley).  One of the questions(11e) on the background check to get a gun asks if you are "unlawful user of " pretty much any drug including weed. Betts would have checked yes on this even though he was doing "heavy drugs" with his friend and was on cocaine when he committed the crime.


If you have any questions feel free to head over to the Facebook page and ask under the link post.  :)

#XcerptShow


As always leave comment via G+ on the website or like the Facebook page and comment on the post with the site link in it.  What do YOU think?

Links:

Subscribe to our Channel:www.youtube.com/user/xcerptshow

Like us on Facebook: facebook.com/xcerptshow


Follow us on Twitter: @xcerptshow

What we know about Devon Bailey

Shortly before the Dayton mass shooting and the El Paso Walmart shooting, Devon "Spazz" Bailey was shot by police while fleeing. The police have released a very comprehensive set of videos and audio regarding the 911 call, radio traffic, stop and shooting. Bailey was no "great man" as his mother tries to portray him, but was the shooting a proper use of force or excessive?



Suspect: Devon Bailey(19) out on bond for sexual assault against a minor.
Shots fired: 9
Hits: 4
Shooters: 2 police

Bailey was a suspect in an alleged recently committed armed robbery where the victim identified the type of gun(Glock 23), the street names of both people involved and the age of Bailey.  The caller gave details on what was missing(wallet and identification contents).  One thing people are missing is that Bailey was only 19.  He was unable to posses a handgun legally. He also was unable to conceal a handgun(no license). Being on bond has other weapon related restrictions. The act of a crime allegedly being committed with a deadly weapon, and these other legal infractions makes him a dangerous suspect.

Protest

The shooting has sparked multiple protests where guns have been drawn by citizens. Below is a peaceful march promoting the slogan of #blacklivesmatter .


Dad:
"I don't want to make this about 'Black Lives Matter' or anything, because all of our lives matter. I know everyone says my son was killed by a white cop and he's a black man in the community, and yes, those are facts. But that's not what this is about. This is about what's right is right and what's wrong is wrong, and what's wrong is my son was shot in the back by law enforcement,"
Mom:
"De'Von was a great kid, great son, great man." (s)

Public's thoughts

The facts lead to a different story from what his dad and mom said.  Many people have a Hollywood understanding of how the world works. Many YouTube commentators parrot phrases like:  "tazed him", "shoot him in the leg", "let him run away", "you cant shoot a person in the back", ect.

Lets hit those first few.
"they could have tazed him"
 No cop is going to to pull a tazer against a gun. A tazer is less than lethal force. Police are to use "necessary force". Force is escalated by the suspect. If the suspect resists with non lethal weapons or open hand techniques then a tazer can be used. If the suspect has a gun and looks like he might be reaching for it then the suspect as escalated the use of force to deadly force, and the cop will rightfully use deadly force.  The gun was identified by a witness, and the red shirt in the body cam indicated that Bailey had the weapon.
"shoot him in the leg"
Shooting someone in the leg would be considered excessive force. If you can shoot someone purposely in a nonlethal manner then the imminent threat criteria is not met. Sometimes, shots incapacitate suspects, but that is not trained. Cops are trained to use lethal force to be LETHAL.
"Let him run away"
They could have let him run away, but that option was superseded by the threat of a gun he appeared to be trying to pull of of his pants that they were told he had.
Most of the people making these kinds of justifications had not seen the full video. They were going off the lead of how the MSM was reporting the issue which was dishonestly.

The simple fact of the matter is that he was a guy who made poor decisions.  He was only 19 and already looking at possibly becoming a sex offender.  He was walking around illegally possessing a handgun. He was found to have THC in his blood during the autopsy.
Authorities have not release the origins of the handgun.
Was the gun stolen?
Was it previously used in other crimes by him or anyone else?
For every odd justification for Bailey there were probably 4-5 people calling it a good shoot. He was a danger, and the cops had to protect themselves.  Most of them did not know the additional background information about Bailey, but it seems a few had seen the full video.

YOU DECIDE

ABC's reporting:

Look at the statements made in the ABC video(top listed video in "Devon Bailey" search on YT).
"At one point, the video shows his hands in the air running away; he is then shot"
His hands were around his pants the entire time he was running. They were not even swinging in a natural running motion much less in the air.
"The officers later performing CPR on Bailey..."
No CPR was performed in the video. Basic gunshot triage kits were used because he was shot...with a gun.
"police say Bailey had a gun, and can see as they TRY and retrieve the OBJECT"
The police were told exactly what gun he had by the witness. He was told three times to put his hands up while running BEFORE being shot while digging for the weapon.
"Police continue to insist that Bailey had a gun"
The gun was in his pocket and was identified in the body cam video by police.
All of these statements are made to create doubt about the shooting. This is consistent with average MSM coverage of similar events. Instead of reporting facts and getting stuff correct in certain situations they try to shift perception to a controversial narrative that they want to promote.

Body cam package released by police(shows actual shooting)911 call, dispatch audio, 2 body cams:



Criminal History

Who was Bailey before this incident.  The family lawyer says Bailey had no prior convictions before this incident. There were, however, three charges found in county records. Two of the three charges were dropped in cases involving sexual assault of two different minors. Bailey plead "not guilty". (s)
Bailey at this point was 19 years old and illegally possessing and concealing a gun in a neighborhood near a school. He also was singled out as being a suspect in and armed robbery.
The third charge was part of an OPEN case against Bailey.  He was out on bond for that sexual assault case against a minor. (s)

Conspiracy?

Conspiracy theory by the lawyer of the Bailey family:
The person who called 911 and Bailey had a fist fight and the caller knew Bailey had a gun so he made a false statement to police about a robbery to get him in trouble. (s)

So in this case what is the official narrative? What would be considered a "conspiracy theory"?
Is what the lawyer said official or conspiracy?
Is what ABC released official or conspiracy?
Is what the police releases official or conspiracy?
If the MSM consistently lies and gets caught then why is a search for facts by citizens a bad thing?


If you have any questions feel free to head over to the Facebook page and ask under the link post.  :)

#XcerptShow


As always leave comment via G+ on the website or like the Facebook page and comment on the post with the site link in it.  What do YOU think?

Links:

Subscribe to our Channel:www.youtube.com/user/xcerptshow

Like us on Facebook: facebook.com/xcerptshow


Follow us on Twitter: @xcerptshow

Monday, August 12, 2019

What were the views of the Garlic Festival shooter?


In a short period of time there have been an increasing number of shootings by young males.  They all appear to have similar views. This brief article will be to expose the views of the Garlic festival shooter. The views of the Walmart El Paso shooter are talked about as well as the Dayton shooter.  The interest isnt to praise or promote, but to know what to look for in others. The three shooters have a unifying core ideology that will surprise you.  It isnt "white supremacy".

The core unifying ideology of the three most recent shooters is radical environmentalism.  For the purposes here we will define a radical environmentalist as someone who places the well being of the environment over the well being of people.  The El Paso shooter wrote a manifesto showing exactly what he thought. He even pointed to the Australia shooting as a source for his ideology. The Garlic shooter(Legan) made a statement on Instagram about the Garlic Festival while he was scoping out the event.

heavy.com
Heavy.com seems to get the scoop on all of these shooters extremely quickly. They were able to pull this screen shot within 13 hours of him posting it as you can see under the post. He was said to done the shooting at almost 1800, but look at the shadows cast on the sign this was maybe taken around 1300? So sometime after 0100 the night after they were able to have his name and scrape all the relevant social media data. Props to them.

But lets look at the quote, "Why overcrowd towns and pave more open space to make room for hordes of mestizos and Silicon Valley white twats?" Sources have been trying to point to the book mentioned above it "Might is Right" and try to push the narrative to white supremacy.  This seems odd when his primary concern is the environment as opposed to which race(he mentions mestizos and whites) is overcrowding "open spaces".  The same type of language was pushed by the Australian shooter, the El Paso shooter, Bill Gates and is present in Antifa talking points(Dayton shooter was either in or affiliated with Antifa ).  Heavy has inadvertently connected the "Might is Right" book to Satanism with this quote, "According to ‘Modern Satanism: Anatomy of a Subculture,’ the book ‘Might Is Right’ is said to expand on German philosopher Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s “theories of master–slave morality and herd mentality …” The Dayton shooter was a proud satanist.
I threw Bill Gates into the mix because he is a radical environmentalist as well.  Bill Gates being a radical environmentalist is NOT a conspiracy theory it is taken out of his own mouth in TED talk he did.  He advocated for the reduction of the human population in order to reduce the amount of carbon we produced.  How he goes about that goal is debatable as to whether it is a conspiracy theory or not which I will not get into.  How do sources attribute white supremacy with his beliefs?   

heavy.com


The "white supremacist" label is hard to follow considering he self identified as Italian and Iranian.  While both of these are Aryan groups, they are hardly the Third Reich's "master race" blonde hair and blues eyes. Legan was 2nd generation Iranian.  So this wasnt some far off connection he was trying to establish; he knew people in his family that immigrated from Iran. The Italian appears to be much more distant, but Italian heritage is celebrated heavily.

Where do these views put him on the political scale? Most outlets will try to push the book as a strictly racial book.  The book is only a supporting idea from a basic concept of protecting resources from people.  The El Paso shooter said he didnt consider mestizos as a target until he read Tarrants(Australia shooter) manifesto.  The odd thing is an Australian doesnt have much connection with mestizos and he shot up a mosque. The dominant religion of a mestizo population would be Catholicism.  The "white supremacy" angle is nothing more than a focused target for their actions.
Radical environmentalism is a far left political view. All of these shooters have been told that the world is going to end by leftists most recently by Alexandria Cortez and Robert ORourke.  So why not go shoot people and save the world?  The leftist male with no future(the world wont be around in 10 years...) is an easy target for this brainwashing and radicalization. They are told by politicians to go out and harass people.  The polarization is at a high point.  It has moved beyond a healthy debate over the correct policy to have to attack the people who dont hold our views.  Antifa has been getting more and more aggressive and calling for stabbing of politicians on the right.

Immigration, gun control, gender identity and a host of other political policies are now "fighting words" on the left.  What happened to debate? What happened to an intellectual defense of ideas instead of a move toward terroristic mindset of intimidation with physical violence and death from the left? 

Fight back against the shooters and stop them. They are untrained amateurs who have done little if any objective research, and can be overtaken easily.  An attempted mosque shooting in Norway shortly after Dayton and El Paso was stopped by a 65 year old man. I have been preaching this since viewing the Autralia shooting video.  The Australia video should be an ad promoting concealed carry.  He was a complete amateur, but because everyone ran away and no one challenged him he killed over 40 people.  Tarrant dropped all of his mags in the mosque hallway, and had to return to pick up a magazine to reload each time.

If you have any questions feel free to head over to the Facebook page and ask under the link post.  :)

#XcerptShow


As always leave comment via G+ on the website or like the Facebook page and comment on the post with the site link in it.  What do YOU think?

Links:

Subscribe to our Channel:www.youtube.com/user/xcerptshow

Like us on Facebook: facebook.com/xcerptshow


Follow us on Twitter: @xcerptshow